User talk:Saintrotter

Welcome!

Hello, Saintrotter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! ¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 23:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moscow

You are a member of WikiProject Russia. I wanted to let you know the article Moscow is in Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Moscow list now. --Hirakawacho 10:57, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mamintb.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mamintb.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. AAA! ^(AAAA) 06:23, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am interested and replied. --Saintrotter 3 March 2007

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Nardman1 20:09, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

People should refrain from undoing my work too. My picture is superior and I have stated why. I have fixed any problems in the picture as editing comments said. I'm sure I do not need to remind you the rules of wikipedia about being neutral and treating everyone the same? Yet I don't see any edit warnings and threats of being blocked on Hayford Peirce page for eiditing my work for only reason because he thinks it's racist for a black woman to have the same bright red lipstick as the white woman and I changed it to pink and he still cries racism and edits my work.

Saintrotter 3 March 2007

3RR block

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

-- zzuuzz^(talk) 23:59, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did discuss them fully in 4 different places.

Saintrotter 4 March 2007

The relevant part of the rule is to not continue reverting. -- zzuuzz^(talk) 00:04, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would not need to keep reverting if someone didn't keep reverting my work, with baseless claims that it is racist then they admit it's not racist.

Saintrotter 4 March 2007

How to easily sign your posts with date and time

Hi, I noticed that you are manually signing your posts on talk pages. The following is a much easier way to do it, automatically, and may be of interest to you:

As a courtesy to other editors, it is a Wikipedia guideline to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, and WikiProject pages. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments and your user name or IP address and the date will be automatically added along with a timestamp. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). For further info, read Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you.

Cheers, Mark ^(Talk) 20:53, 15 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Vandalism

Your vandalism of Jeremy Kyle is unwelcome. Consider this a warning. I suggest you stick to reading the Daily Mail. Parmesan 18:56, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you read wikipedia's rules on personal attacks states that users' affiliations are irrelelant to their contributions and should never be used to dismiss their views. It further notes to comment on article content and not the character of other Wikipedian users. Saintrotter 19:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I withdraw my comment about the Daily Mail. There was no need to get personal. However, in regard to your comments, your vandalism did not express any view. It was mere silliness adding a "The" to the beginning of a sentence which did not require it. The warning stands and I shall be monitoring your contributions for vandalism in the future, as I am for many others. I see that you have already been temporarily banned before - best not for it to happen again, eh? Parmesan 20:37, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As a Christian, I will forgive you. But I will be monitoring your contributions for personal attacks in the future, as I am for many others. I see you have not been temporarily banned before - best not for it to ever happen, eh? Saintrotter 21:13, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your contribution

The tone of your User page and of your edits to the Wikipedia have been recently put in question by a member of the community. You are encouraged to keep contributing to the project as long as you adopt a less aggressive position and start discussing more openly with other editors. Also, please remember to assume good faith, as everybody is trying to build a good encyclopedia here. If you fail to change your conduct, you will be blocked for a substantial amount of time. --Sn0wflake 18:20, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

read WP:DAILYMAIL! Chronic The Wedgehog 19:30, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A whole member of the community! :O I'd hate to think what would happen if there were two members... Anyways... I am not being aggressive at all. I am having good fun here and enjoy making wikipedia better and have made many good edits as you can see from my edit history. Also remember please assume good faith with me Sn0wflake as everybody is trying to build a good encyclopedia here. Saintrotter 22:40, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chronic The Wedgehog I suggest you read wikipedia's rules on personal attacks states that users' affiliations are irrelelant to their contributions and should never be used to dismiss their views. It further notes to comment on article content and not the character of other Wikipedian users. Saintrotter 22:42, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, but I am assuming good faith... being a part of the zionist Cabal and all I should have permanently blocked you outright, no? Now, seriously... please tone down your User page. You are probably trying to make a (valid?) point, but it simply does not help a lot when it comes to matters such as these. Let's try to solve this, 'cause your contributions shouldn't be something to get you blocked (merely warned, as you have been), but your User page is. As for the complaints, just try to think a little more about the other involved parties when you make edits, that's all. And yeah, "one whole user" can actually make a differece. :P --Sn0wflake 03:23, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LOL Chronic The Wedgehog 19:01, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You need to know that there are several admins ready to block you if you put the Nazi flag back on your user page. Please do not do it again. — coel acan — 21:54, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, I guess it must hurt them several admins knowing that Israel is doing the same crimes that Nazi's are accused off. But under Wikipedia rules, I am doing nothing wrong showing a flag. Saintrotter 14:55, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apart from several other policies, you violate WP:DICK. --Stephan Schulz 15:04, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice of you admit I'm not breaking the rules with flags. Now what are these 'several other policies' I apparently violate? Saintrotter 17:09, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mu. --Stephan Schulz 17:16, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I've rolled back your changes to your userpage, as I'm sure that you're well aware that putting the Palestinian flag next to the name of the country of Israel is almost as inflammatory as using the Nazi flag.

Your editing privileges have been suspended for 24 hours. Please bear in mind that Wikipedia is not a soapbox. If you'd like to start a flamewar about Israel, that's something to do on your own website or blog. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 15:24, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia; it is considered to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

And don’t hoist either the flags of Palastine or Nazi Germany in Israel’s information box. {{flagicon:Israel}} --86.25.49.91 04:47, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please always observe our core policies. Thank you.

Irma Grese in March 2007.

--86.25.49.91 04:47, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Hello. I'm in agreement with the recent revert you made . You may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Generaly to Irma Grese, User:Hayford Peirce, Talk:White people, Jeremy Kyle, User:Homer slips, ect.

--86.25.49.91 04:47, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. In case you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, particularly to userpages. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you.

To User:Homer slips in March 2007

Irma Grese

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

Do not add remarks that trivialise the importance or factual content of the Holocaust or Nazi War crimes commited by people like Irma Grese. --86.29.255.84 04:49, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Please stop being uncivil to your fellow editors; instead, assume that they are here to improve Wikipedia.

The user and at least 1 of his sock puppets has made libellous talk page remarks a On the talk pages of- User:Homer slips., User:Markdr, User:Hayford Peirce, User :Sebbeng, and User:Zoe

The false calm about User Sebbeng on the Debbie King talk page is here-[[1]]

His attack on User Markdr’s talk page is here- [[2]]

His attack on User Homer slip’s talk page is here-

[[3]]

His attack on User Hayford Peirce’s talk page is here- [[4]] --86.29.255.84 04:49, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Boris Berezovsky/ Lazer Kaganovich/Nicolas Sarkozy/ Debbie King and Gillo Pontecotvo

This is your last warning. The next time you add defamatory content, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

The user and at least 1 of his sock puppets have a bizarrely disturbing fixation with the subjects’ Jewish roots.

[[5]]

[[6]]

[[7]]

[[8]]

[[9]] --86.29.255.84 04:49, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad

Please stop. If you continue to add defamatory content, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Another of his sock puppets also insulted the Prophet Muhammad.

[[10]] [[11]] --86.29.255.84 04:49, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent POV pushing, trolling, and soapboxing despite repeated warnings.. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Krimpet (talk) 20:17, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]